Wouldn't the Sunbelt get more money from the Belk Bowl? So should cancel out at worst, the money we would lose by paying Liberty or someone else to go
I can certainly understand waiting in terms of flights. As far as time off, I've always just gone ahead and put a request in for what I need as soon as
Whichever Sun Belt Bowl gets shorted would have to pick from the teams that didn't get into their conference's AQ bowls.
I meant there are just enough Sun Belt bowl eligible teams for the tie ins. So let's say Liberty would go to Arizona instead? And as Klak mentioned,
If a Army beats Navy, they'll be 6-7, would they be bowl eligible?
Right now there are 79 bowl eligible teams for 78 spots. So there are enough teams to fill every slot wlithout having to dip down into the 5-7 teams.
IMO that rigid stance is just a front. It would be extremely stupid for the conference to turn down a bigger bowl IMO just due to tie ins. The bigger
Well 3 of the bowls are on the same date, so that's not going to change. And can't say in 20 years and many jobs were I didn't have the flexibility of
Recent Forum Posts
Re: Realistic Bowl Selection
Wouldn't the Sunbelt get more money from the Belk Bowl? So should cancel out at worst, the money we would lose by paying Liberty or someone else to go
Not Roger Inman 6th December 2019, 08:33 AM